Fructosan form Paenibacillus kribbensis PS04 enhance disease resistance against Rhizoctonia solani and tobacco mosaic virus

BACKGROUND: Rice sheath blight (caused by Rhizoctonia solani) and tobacco mosaic virus are very important plant diseases, causing a huge loss in global crop production. Paenibacillus kribbensis PS04 is a broad-spectrum biocontrol agent, used for controlling these diseases. Previously, extracellular polysaccharides (EPS) from P. kribbensis PS04 had been purified and their structure was inferred to be fructosan. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of exogenous EPS treatment on plant­pathogen interactions. RESULTS: Plant defense genes such as phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, catalase, chitinase, allene oxide synthase, and PR1a proteins were significantly induced by exogenous EPS treatment. Moreover, subsequent challenge of EPSpretreated plants with the pathogens (R. solani or tobacco mosaic virus) resulted in higher expression of defenseassociated genes. Increased activities of defense-associated enzymes, total phenols, and flavonoids were also observed in EPS pretreated plants. The contents of malondialdehyde in plants, which act as indicator of lipid peroxidation, were reduced by EPS treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This study comprehensively showed that EPS produced from P. kribbensis PS04 enhances disease resistance in plants by the activation of defense-associated genes as well as through the enhancement of activities of defense-related enzymes.

Prophylactic treatment of vestibular migraine / Tratamento profilático da migrânea vestibular

Abstract Introduction: Vestibular migraine (VM) is now accepted as a common cause of episodic vertigo. Treatment of VM involves two situations: the vestibular symptom attacks and the period between attacks. For the latter, some prophylaxis methods can be used. The current recommendation is to use the same prophylactic drugs used for migraines, including β-blockers, antidepressants and anticonvulsants. The recent diagnostic definition of vestibular migraine makes the number of studies on its treatment scarce. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic treatment used in patients from a VM outpatient clinic. Methods: Review of medical records from patients with VM according to the criteria of the Bárány Society/International Headache Society of 2012 criteria. The drugs used in the treatment and treatment response obtained through the visual analog scale (VAS) for dizziness and headache were assessed. The pre and post-treatment VAS scores were compared (the improvement was evaluated together and individually, per drug used). Associations with clinical subgroups of patients were also assessed. Results: Of the 88 assessed records, 47 were eligible. We included patients that met the diagnostic criteria for VM and excluded those whose medical records were illegible and those of patients with other disorders causing dizziness and/or headache that did not meet the 2012 criteria for VM. 80.9% of the patients showed improvement with prophylaxis (p < 0.001). Amitriptyline, Flunarizine, Propranolol and Topiramate improved vestibular symptoms (p < 0.001) and headache (p < 0.015). The four drugs were effective in a statistically significant manner. There was a positive statistical association between the time of vestibular symptoms and clinical improvement. There was no additional benefit in hypertensive patients who used antihypertensive drugs as prophylaxis or depressed patients who used antidepressants in relation to other prophylactic drugs. Drug association did not show statistically significant results in relation to the use of a single drug. Conclusions: Prophylactic medications used to treat VM improve the symptoms of this disease, but there is no statistically significant difference between the responses of prophylactic drugs. The time of vestibular symptom seems to increase the benefit with prophylactic treatment.

Resumo Introdução: A migrânea vestibular (MV) é aceita atualmente como uma causa comum de vertigem episódica. O tratamento da MV envolve duas situações: as crises de sintomas vestibulares e o período intercrise. Para esse último, pode-se usar algum método de profilaxia. A recomendação atual é que se usem os mesmos medicamentos profiláticos usados para a enxaqueca, o que inclui os β-bloqueadores, antidepressivos e anticonvulsivantes. A recente definição diagnóstica da migrânea vestibular torna escasso o número de estudos sobre seu tratamento. Objetivo: Avaliar a eficácia do tratamento profilático usado em pacientes em um ambulatório de MV. Método: Revisão de prontuários de pacientes com MV pelos critérios da Bárány Society/International Headeache Society de 2012. Foram pesquisados os medicamentos usados e resposta ao tratamento obtida através da escala visual analógica (EVA) para tontura e cefaleia. Foram comparados os escores da EVA pré e pós-tratamento (a melhoria foi avaliada em conjunto e individualmente por droga usada). Também foram pesquisadas relações com subgrupos clínicos dos pacientes. Resultados: De 88 prontuários estudados, 47 foram elegíveis. Incluíram-se os pacientes que preenchiam os critérios diagnósticos para MV, foram excluídos os prontuários ilegíveis e aqueles de pacientes com outro distúrbio causador de tontura e/ou cefaleia que não preenchiam critérios de 2012 para MV. Apresentaram melhoria com a profilaxia 80,9% dos pacientes (p < 0,001). Amitriptilina, flunarizina, propranolol e topiramato apresentaram melhoria para sintomas vestibulares (p < 0,001) e para cefaleia (p < 0,015). Os quatro medicamentos foram eficazes de forma estatisticamente significante. Houve relação estatística positiva entre tempo de sintoma vestibular e melhoria clínica. Não houve benefício adicional para hipertensos que usaram anti-hipertensivos como profilaxia ou para os deprimidos que usaram antidepressivos em relação ao uso dos outros profiláticos. A associação de medicamentos não mostrou resultados estatisticamente significantes do uso de um medicamento isolado. Conclusões: Os medicamentos profiláticos usados para MV melhoram os sintomas dessa doença, porém não há diferença estatisticamente significante entre as respostas dos medicamentos profiláticos. O tempo de sintoma vestibular parece aumentar a melhoria obtida com o tratamento profilático.

Topiramate-associated acute, bilateral, angle-closure glaucoma: case report / Glaucoma agudo de ângulo fechado, bilateral, desencadeado pelo topiramato: relato de caso

This paper describes a topiramate induced acute bilateral angle-closure glaucoma. This rare adverse effect is an idiosyncratic reaction characterized by uveal effusion and lens forward displacement, leading to increased intraocular pressure and vision loss. We describe a 55 year-old white woman with migraine, spasmodic torticollis and essential tremor, who developed bilateral acute angle-closure glaucoma, one week after starting topiramate 25 mg/day. She was seen at the Ophthalmology Emergency Department of the Fundação João Penido Burnier (Campinas, SP, Brazil) with a 4 hours history of blurry vision, ocular pain and bright flashes vision. Slit lamp examination revealed moderate conjunctival injection and corneal edema, and shallow anterior chambers. Intraocular pressure was 48 mmHg in both eyes. Fundoscopic examination findings were normal. She was treated with timolol, brimonidine, dorzolamide, pilocarpine, prednisone acetate eye drops and acetazolamide. One hour after those measures, as the intraocular pressure was 30 mmHg, she received a manitol intravenous injection and the intraocular pressure normalized. After 24 hours an iridotomy with Yag laser was performed. Topiramate was discontinued and she was totally recovered after one week.

Relato de um caso de glaucoma bilateral de ângulo fechado induzido pelo topiramato. Este raro efeito colateral é uma idiosincrasia causada por efusão uveal e deslocamento do cristalino para frente, causando aumento da pressão intraocular e perda visual. Descrevemos o caso de uma paciente de 55 anos com migrânea, torcicolo espasmódico e tremor essencial, que desenvolveu glaucoma bilateral de ângulo fechado uma semana após iniciar o uso de topiramato, 25 mg/dia. A paciente foi atendida no setor de Emergências Oftalmológicas da Fundação Penido Burnier (Campinas, SP, Brasil), com história de 4 horas de embaçamento visual, dor ocular e visão de flashes brilhantes. O exame com lâmpada de fenda revelou injeção conjuntival moderada, edema corneano e câmara anterior rasa em ambos os olhos. A pressão intraocular era de 48 mmHg bilateralmente e a fundoscopia era normal. Foi tratada com colírios de timolol, brimonidina, dorzolamida, pilocarpina e acetato de prednisona e acetazolamida via oral. Uma hora após essas medidas, a pressão intraocular era 30 mmHg, e a paciente recebeu uma injeção intravenosa de manitol, ocorrendo normalização da pressão intraocular após essa medida. Após 24 horas foi realizada iridectomia com Yag laser. O topiramato foi interrompido e ela se recuperou totalmente após uma semana.

Efficacy and safety of topiramate as the first - line drug in the treatment of infantile spasms

Infantile Spasms [IS] is one of the catastrophic epileptic syndromes of infancy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical efficacy and safety of to piramate [TPM] as the first -line drug in the treatment of infantile spasms. In a quasi- experimental study, efficacy and safety of TPM in treatment of forty children with IS who were referred to pediatric neurology clinic of Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences in Yazd, Iran, from September 2008to 2010 was evaluated. Twenty two girls [55%] and 18 boys [45%] with a mean age of 9.2 +/- 3.9 months [range= 3-20 months] were evaluated. Ninety percent of the patients had symptomatic IS. At the end of three months of TPM treatment, 40% of the patients became seizure free, 27.5% had more than 50% reduction in seizure frequency, 27.5% had no notable change in seizure frequency and 5% had an increased frequency of seizures. Transient and mild side effects, which were seen in 32.5% of the patients, included drowsiness in 15%, hypotonia and hyperthermia [each one] in 7.5%and anorexia and weight loss in 2.5%. All side effects disappeared in two or three weeks of treatment. Topiramate is an effective and safe drug in the treatment of IS and could be considered as the first line of treatment

Efficacy of combined topiramate/thioctic acid therapy in migraine prophylaxis

Migraine cannot be cured and the aim, shared with the patient, is to minimize the impact of the illness on the patient's life and lifestyle. The aim of prophylaxis is to reduce the number of migraine attacks. Prophylaxis should be considered when appropriately used acute management gives inadequate control of symptoms. The efficacy and safety of topiramate 50mg/d and thioctic acid [alpha-lipoic acid] 300 mg/d either as monotherapy or in combination were investigated as migraine prophylactic agents. Forty secondary school migraineur girls were enrolled in the study. The study was conducted in two phases, a prospective baseline phase and 1-month treatment phase. Combined topiramate/thioctic acid therapy was more effective than either topiramate or thioctic acid monotherapy as a migraine-preventive treatment. Combined topiramate/thioctic acid therapy decreased the mean monthly migraine frequency from 5.86 +/- 1.2 to 2.6 +/- 0.98 [P /= 50% reduction in monthly migraine frequency] was 85% in patients receiving combined topiramate/thioctic acid therapy compared to 30% and 20% in patients receiving either topiramate or thioctic acid, respectively. The incidence of adverse events was higher in patients receiving topiramate [50 mg/d] monotherapy. The most common adverse events were nausea, fatigue, paraesthesia and taste perversion. We conclude that combined topiramate/thioctic acid therapy is more effective and better tolerated than topiramate monotherapy. The combination has lower monthly medication costs compared to the traditionally used topiramate 100 mg monotherapy

Topiramate-induced angle closure with acute myopia, macular striae

Topiramate is a sulfamate-substituted monosaccharide used is the treatment of seizures, and prophylaxis of migraine. A number of ocular side-effects have been described with use of topiramate, like bilateral angle closure, acute myopia and macular striae. Ultrasound biomicroscopy [UBM] clinches the diagnosis after ruling out other causes of shallow tomography anterior chamber. Previous studies have not demonstrated internal limiting membrane folds presenting as macular striae. We report a case of topiramate-induced acute myopia with angle closure and macular striae in a young adult. This is the report wherein striae formation after low doses of topiramate and their resolution have been documented by Optical Coherence Tomography [OCT]

Prevalence of epilepsy and seizure disorders as causes of apparent life- threatening event (ALTE) in children admitted to a tertiary hospital / Prevalência de epilepsia e crises epilépticas como causa de eventos com aparente risco de vida (ALTE) em crianças internadas em hospital terciário

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and describe clinical characteristics of seizure disorders and epilepsy as causes of apparent life- threatening event (ALTE) in children admitted at the emergency and followed in a tertiary hospital. METHOD: Cross-sectional study with prospective data collection using specific guidelines to determine the etiology of ALTE. RESULTS: During the study, 30 (4.2 percent) children admitted to the hospital had a diagnosis of ALTE. There was a predominance of males (73 percent) and term infants (70 percent). Neonatal neurological disorders and neuropsychomotor development delay were found respectively in 13.4 percent and 10 percent of the cases. Etiological investigation revealed that 50 percent of the cases were idiopathic, and 13.4 percent were caused by epilepsy or seizure disorders. Although all patients had recurrent ALTE events, epilepsy had not been previously suspected. CONCLUSION: Epilepsy should be included in the differential diagnosis of ALTE, particularly when events are recurrent.

OBJETIVO: Determinar a prevalência e características clínicas de crises epilépticas e epilepsia como causa de eventos com aparente risco de vida (ALTE) em crianças atendidas na emergência e acompanhadas em hospital terciário. MÉTODO: Estudo transversal com coleta prospectiva de dados através de protocolo específico para identificação da etiologia de ALTE. RESULTADOS: Foram diagnosticadas 30 crianças com ALTE perfazendo 4.2 por cento das crianças internadas no período do estudo. Houve predominância no sexo masculino (73 por cento) e em neonatos a termo (70 por cento). História prévia de doenças neurológicas no período neonatal e atraso no desenvolvimento neuropsicomotor ocorreram respectivamente em 13.4 por cento e 10 por cento dos casos. A investigação etiológica identificou 13.4 por cento dos casos relacionados a epilepsia ou crise convulsivas e 50 por cento idiopáticos. Apesar destes pacientes terem apresentados episódios recorrentes em nenhum caso havia a suspeita prévia de epilepsia. CONCLUSÃO: Ao investigar pacientes com ALTE a possibilidade do diagnóstico de epilepsia deve ser fortemente considerada principalmente nos casos recorrentes.

Tratamiento del estado epiléptico refractario con topiramato oral / Treatment of refractory status epilepticus with topiramate: report of three cases

Refractory status epilepticus is a catastrophic illness of the central nervous system, with a mortality rate that reaches 50 percent. We report three patients admitted with refractory status epilepticus: a 24 year-old male that discontinued antiepileptic medications, a 46 year-old male with a focal epilepsy secondary to an encephalitis that discontinued medications due to gastrointestinal problems and a 59 year-old male with an ischemic encephalopathy AH were treated with topiramate, delivered through a nasogastric tube with a good response.

Miopia aguda e glaucoma de ângulo fechado associados ao uso de topiramato em paciente jovem: relato de caso / Acute myopia and angle closure glaucoma associated with topiramate use in a young patient: case report

O glaucoma agudo de ângulo fechado pode ser secundário, dentre outras causas, ao uso de medicações sistêmicas, como o anticonvulsivante topiramato. Esse trabalho descreve o caso de uma paciente jovem com quadro agudo bilateral de miopia e glaucoma de ângulo fechado induzidos por terapia com topiramato para prevenção de crises de enxaqueca, fazendo relação com casos semelhantes descritos na literatura e revisão bibliográfica referentes à entidade.

Acute angle-closure glaucoma may be induced, among other causes, by therapy with systemic drugs, such as the anticonvulsant topiramate. This paper reports the case of an young patient with acute myopia and angle-closure glaucoma associated with migraine prevention with topiramate. We make a link with similar cases described in medical journals and in a bibliographic review related to this entity.

Papel de la monoterapia con nuevos fármacos antiepilépticos en el tratamiento de la epilepsia infantil / Role of monotherapy with new antiepileptic drugs in the treatment of childhood epilepsy

En este trabajo se revisa la información actual sobre el uso de los nuevos fármacos antiepilépticos (FAEs) en monoterapia en niños, resaltando nuestra experiencia personal. Específicamente, se incluyen los siguientes FAEs: lamotrigina (Lamictal®), topiramato (Topamax®), zonisamida (Zonegran®), levetiracetam (Keppra®), y oxcarbacepina (Trileptal®). Todos estos FAEs tienen un amplio espectro de acción en el tratamiento de crisis epilépticas parciales y generalizadas, excepto la oxcarbacepina, que es eficaz exclusivamente en crisis parciales. No está claro si la monoterapia con estos FAEs, en comparación con los FAEs clásicos (fenobarbital, fenitoína, carbamacepina, valproato sódico), proporciona una mayor eficacia y/o causa menos efectos secundarios y, si por lo tanto, mejora significativamente la calidad de vida de los niños con epilepsia. Se necesitan más estudios para poder contestar estas preguntas.

In this paper we review the current information regarding the use of new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) used as monotherapy in children. We specifically include the following AEDs: lamotrigine (Lamictal®), topiramate (Topamax®), zonisamide (Zonegran®), levetiracetam (Keppra®), and oxcarbazepine (Trileptal®). All of these AEDs have a broad spectrum of action in the treatment of partial and generalized seizures, except Oxcarbazepine, which is effective only in partial seizures. It is unclear whether or not monotherapy with the new AEDs offers higher efficacy and/or lower side effects compared to classic AEDs (phenobarbital, phenytoin, carbamazepine, or valproate) thereby significantly improving the quality of life in children with epilepsy. More studies are needed to answer these questions.

[Effects of topiramate in the prevention of drug resistant migraine headache]

Migraine is the most common cause of headache. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of topiramate [TPM] in the prevention of drug-resistant migraine headache. This is a double-blind clinical trial conducted on 70 patients between ages 15 to 45 years referred to the Bu Ali Sina Hospital in Sari with a history of migraine attacks based on International Headache Society criteria for a period of more than one years with a minimum incidence of 1 to 6 attacks per month. The drug rate performance was assessed by response rate to treatment, mean changes in the number and severity of migraine attacks compare with the placebo group for 3 months. Collected data were analyzed using analysis of variance [ANOVA], Newman-Keuls and Spearman's Coefficient Rank Correlation as the post hoc tests. GRAPHPAD software was used for analysis of the data. 66 of 70 patients completed the study. The mean age of the patients was 30.33 +/- 7.9 years. A significant reduction in the severity and frequency of migraine attacks was seen in all months [P<0.0001] for topiramate treated group in compare to placebo group. Responder rate for patients treated with TPM was significantly higher than placebo group [64.6%, P<0.0001] in the 3 rd month of the treatment side effects of treatment were transient and well tolerated. Low dose of TPM showed significant efficacy in prevention of migraine attacks within the first, second, and third month of treatment. Low dose of TPM seems to be a good therapeutic option for the patients with refractory migraine

[Comparative study of topiramate versus sodium valproate in the prevention of migraine headaches]

Migraine prevention is a major step in control and decreasing frequency of this severe and disabling type of headache. Current study was performed to determine the comparative efficacy of topiramate and sodium valproate in the management of migraine headache. In this double-blind randomized clinical trial, among patients attending to Amir-al-momenin hospital between 2006 and 2007, 285 patients [50.1%] received sodium valproate with a dose of 200 mg/day and 284 subjects [49.9%] received topiramate with a dose of 100 mg/day for one month. 262 patients [91.9%] in sodium valproate group and 266 subjects [93.7%] in topiramate group had good response to treatment [NS]. In sodium valproate group, 40 patients [14%] and in topiramate group, 41 subjects [14.4%] experienced drug adverse effects [NS]. According to lack of statistically significant differences between therapeutic efficacy and adverse effects of sodium valproate and topiramate, both modalities may be indicated upon with patient's conditions and physician's opinion

Double-blind, randomized, clinical trial of topiramate versus sodium valproate for the treatment of bipolar disorder in adolescents

To study the efficacy and safety of Topiramate versus Sodium Valproate for the Treatment of Bipolar Disorder in Adolescents. One hundred twenty adolescents [aged 12-18] with an admission diagnosis of bipolar I disorder, manic or mixed episode were enrolled from the Adolescent Ward at Ebn-e-Sina Psychiatric Center of Mashhad University. They were assigned to receive 8 weeks of double-blinded, flexibly dosed treatment with topiramate or sodium valproate. The primary efficacy measure was the mean change from baseline to endpoint in the Young Mania Rating Scale [YMRS]. Sodium Valproate was superior to topiramate. The YMRS scores decreased significantly in both groups. However, when efficacy of topiramte was analyzed, only 18.64% of the patients showed YMRS scores decrease more than 50% from baseline. This study does not support the efficacy of topiramate as monotherapy in acute mania or mixed episodes in adolescents with bipolar I disorder and sodium valproate was found superior to topiramate

Influence of NMDA and non-NMDA antagonists on acute and inflammatory pain in the trigeminal territory: a placebo control study / Influência dos antagonistas dos receptores NMDA e não-NMDA sobre a dor aguda e inflamatória ao nível do território do trigêmeo: um estudo placebo controlado

NMDA and non-NMDA receptors are involved in spinal transmission of nociceptive information in physiological and pathological conditions. Our objective was to study the influence of NMDA and non-NMDA receptor antagonists on pain control in the trigeminal system using a formalin-induced orofacial pain model. Motor performance was also evaluated. Male Rattus norvegicus were pre-treated with topiramate (T) (n=8), memantine (M) (n=8), divalproex (D) (n=8) or isotonic saline solution (ISS) (n=10) intraperitoneally 30 minutes before the formalin test. Formalin 2.5 percent was injected into the right upper lip (V2 branch) and induced two phases: phase I (early or neurogenic) (0-3 min) and phase II (late or inflammatory) (12-30 min). For motor behavior performance we used the open-field test and measured latency to movement onset, locomotion and rearing frequencies, and immobility time. Pre-treatment of animals with M and D only attenuated nociceptive formalin behavior for phase II. T increased locomotion and rearing frequencies and reduced immobility time. Treatment with M increased immobility time and with D reduced locomotion frequency. Our results showed that the NMDA antagonist (M) is more potent than the non-NMDA antagonists (D and T) in the control of pain in the inflammatory phase. The non-NMDA topiramate improved motor performance more than did D and M, probably because T has more anxiolytic properties.

Receptores NMDA e não-NMDA estão envolvidos na transmissão das informações nociceptivas em condições fisiológicas e patológicas. Com o objetivo de estudar a influência dos antagonistas dos receptores NMDA e não-NMDA sobre o controle de dor no sistema trigeminal utilizamos modelo de dor orofacial induzida pela formalina. Testes de desempenho motor foram também avaliados. Ratos machos da espécie Rattus norvegicus foram tratados com topiramato (T) (n=8), memantina (M) (n=8), divalproato de sódio (D) (n=8) ou solução salina isotônica (SSI) (n=10), por via intraperitoneal, 30 minutos antes dos testes com a formalina. Formalina 2.5 por cento foram injetadas na região do lábio superior dos animais (segundo ramo do trigêmeo) induzindo comportamento em duas fases distintas: fase I (precoce ou neurogênica) (0-3 min ) e fase II (tardia ou inflamatória) (12-30 min). Para avaliação da atividade motora utilizou-se o teste do campo aberto mensurando-se a latência para o início dos movimentos, número de casas andadas, freqüência de levantamentos e tempo de imobilidade. Animais pré-tratados com M e D atenuaram a fase inflamatória do teste da formalina. O T aumenta o número de casas andadas, freqüência de levantamentos e reduz o tempo de imobilidade. Nossos resultados mostram que o antagonista NMDA é mais potente do que os antagonistas não-NMDA para o controle da fase inflamatória da dor. O topiramato entretanto aumenta a atividade motora provavelmente porque apresente propriedades ansiolíticas.

Craving decrease with topiramate in outpatient treatment for cocaine dependence: an open label trial / Diminuição da fissura com topiramato no tratamento ambulatorial para dependência de cocaína: um ensaio clínico aberto

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate anticraving action and tolerability of topiramate in cocaine user treatment. METHOD: Male users of inhaled cocaine which met criteria for cocaine dependence (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition) were selected for outpatient 12-week, open label trial with topiramate; individual dosage ranged between 25-300 mg/day. Main clinical variables were abstinence rate, craving intensity, frequency and duration, adherence, dropouts, side effects and impulsivity measure through Barratt Impulsivity Scale. Patients received assertive strategic counseling for abstinence assistance and medication monitoring evaluation every two weeks. Comparative analysis was made with intention to treat, missing values were replaced (last observation carried forward), and significance level was 5 percent. RESULTS: Adherence to treatment was 57 percent (at least three evaluations), 32 percent dropped out (one evaluation). There were no severe side effects. Negative test average was 25.4 percent (31.2). Significant reduction in craving intensity and duration was observed in 25 percent of the sample. No statistical significant reduction in craving frequency was observed in 7.1 percent. Increase in frequency was observed in 10.7 percent and 82.1 percent did not present any variation. No significant statistical variations in Barratt Impulsivity Scale or in the total score were found in the final evaluation when compared to baseline. CONCLUSION: More randomized placebo-controlled trials with topiramate for cocaine dependants should be performed to evaluate preliminary evidence.

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a ação anticraving e tolerabilidade do topiramato em usuários de cocaína. MÉTODO: Homens usuários de cocaína inalada que preenchiam critérios para dependência de cocaína (Manual Diagnóstico e Estatístico de Desordens Mentais, quarta edição) foram selecionados para 12 semanas de tratamento ambulatorial, em ensaio clínico aberto com topiramato; dosagens escalonadas entre 25-300 mg/dia. As principais variáveis clínicas foram taxa de abstinência, intensidade, freqüência e duração do craving, aderência, perdas, efeitos colaterais e impulsividade medida por meio da Escala de Impulsividade Barratt. Os pacientes receberam estratégias assertivas de aconselhamento para manutenção da abstinência e monitoramento da medicação avaliada a cada duas semanas. Análises comparativas foram feitas com intenção de tratar, valores perdidos foram substituídos (última observação carregada ao final) e o nível de significância de 5 por cento. RESULTADOS: A aderência ao tratamento foi de 57 por cento (pelo menos três avaliações), 32 por cento de perdas (uma avaliação). Não houve efeitos colaterais graves. A média de testes negativos foi 25,4 por cento (31,2). Significante redução na intensidade e duração do craving foi observada em 25 por cento da amostra. Nenhuma redução significativa na freqüência do craving foi observada em 7,1 por cento. Aumento na freqüência foi observado em 10,7 por cento e 82,1 por cento não apresentaram nenhuma variação. Nenhuma variação estatisticamente significativa na Escala de Impulsividade Barratt ou na pontuação total foi encontrada no final da avaliação quando comparado à inicial. CONCLUSÃO: Mais ensaios clínicos placebo-controlados com o topiramato para dependentes de cocaína deveriam ser conduzidos a fim de avaliar a evidência preliminar.

Actualización del tratamiento farmacológico de la dependencia alcohólica / Pharmacological review of alcoholic dependence treatment

El objetivo de la presente actualización farmacológica es abordar la problemática de la dependencia alcohólica. Partiendo de las bases biológicas y del impacto del etanol sobre los sistemas neurobiológicos y de neurotransmisión, se hará una revisión de las principales herramientas farmacológicas para el tratamiento de la dependencia alcohólica. El disulfiram, la naltrexona y el acamprosato, todas ellas con aprobación por la FDA (Food and Drug Administration) han mostrado mecanismos de acción, perfiles de eficacia, tolerabilidad y adherencia dispares. También nos referiremos al topiramato, el que está siendo estudiado actualmente con relación a esta indicación.

The aim of the present pharmacological update is to revise the problem of alcohol dependence. Starting from the biological bases and the impact of alcohol on the neurobiological and neurotransmission systems, a revision of the main pharmacological tools for alcohol dependence treatment will be done. Disulfiram, naltrexone, acamprosate, all of them approved by the FDA (Food and Drug Administration), have shown mechanisms of action, efficacy, tolerance and adherence dissimilar. We will also refer to topiramate, which is being studied for this indication.